THE SIDEREAL CHART IS THE MOST ACCURATE? GET YOURS HERE (LINK)?

in my experience, most sidereal astrologers are WAY too caught up in the idea that they are RIGHT and tropical astrologers WRONG, to investigate deeply enough in EITHER discipline to know what they're talking about. I won't say that Fagan and Bradley aren't worth reading, and there's a long tradition of Hindu sidereal astrology, though Hindus use various ayanamsas, or synetic vernal points, to do their calculations, thus their charts don't necessarily agree with Fagan/Bradley or even each other. Personally I find the idea that the constellations AS THEY EXISTED in the sky 2000 years ago have more meaning today than the ACTUAL current PLACEMENT of the equinoxes, and the resultant tropical zodiac, is more fantasy than fact......